RCRA / DOT Hazardous Waste Management Standards

TAS Training

TAS Environmental has expanded its training program by offering classes at your location or at the facility of your choice. For groups of 15 or more, we can even develop customized instruction so you get the greatest value for your training dollar.

Our RCRA/DOT Hazardous Waste Management Standards workshop improves worker safety while protecting the environment. Our workshops also satisfy the training requirements as defined in 40 CFR 262.34(a) and 265.16. In addition to satisfying federal requirements, our workshops also address state requirements as defined by the Texas Commission for Environmental Quality.

Our workshops are developed to satisfy a number requirements including initial training and annual refresher workshops. We will even develop customized workshops for you should your training needs extend beyond the standard courses. Our workshops also satisfy regulatory requirements according to generator status, including:
Large quantity generators per 30 TAC 335.69(a)(4)(A) and 40 CFR 262.34(a)/40 CFR 265.16 and for small quantity generators managing universal waste streams.

Our Next RCRA / DOT Hazardous Waste Management Standards Workshop will be held April 14th, from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm, at:

Hyatt Place
5900 Cityview Blvd
Fort Worth, TX 76132

$249 per person. $199 per person for multiple attendees
from the same company. To register, please complete the
registration form on the next page and forward it to your
TAS Environmental representative.

Click here to learn more.

Read more >

OSHA’s New Confined Space Standard

Re-Posted from Occupational Health & Safety
By Chris Irwin, Jessica Smith

Since it was issued in 1993, OSHA’s confined space regulation, 29 CFR 1910.146, has been geared toward general industry workers, with very little applying directly to the construction industry. Employers in the industry have tended to default to general industry standards but have not had a substantial regulation of their own to fall back on. On Aug. 3, 2015, however, the OSHA confined spaces in construction standard, 29 CFR Subpart AA 1926.1200, joined the existing general industry confined space standard and clearly defined rules for confined spaces in construction. It is estimated that this move can prevent roughly 780 serious injuries and five deaths each year.1

At a confined spaces press conference on May 1, 2015, Dr. David Michaels, assistant secretary of Labor for OSHA, stated, “This rule will save lives of construction workers. Unlike most general industry work sites, construction sites are continually evolving, with the number and characteristics of confined spaces changing as work progresses.”2 He added that “all workers have the right to a safe and healthy workplace, and it only makes sense that all workers have similar protections when working around the same hazards.”3

Confined Space vs. PRCS
First, let’s define a confined space. A confined space is a space large enough for a worker to enter, is not designed for “continuous employee occupancy,” and has limited means for entry and exit.4 A permit-required confined space (PRCS) is a confined space with one or more of the following characteristics:

  • Contains or has a potential to contain a hazardous atmosphere
  • Contains a material that has the potential for engulfing an entering employee
  • Has an internal configuration such that an employee could be trapped or asphyxiated by inwardly converging walls or by a downward-sloping floor
  • Contains any other recognized serious safety or health hazard5

Common Hazards
The new rules aim to reduce the risks presented by hazards common to confined spaces in the construction industry, such as oxygen deficiency and the presence of explosive or toxic gases, vapors, or fumes. Examples of confined spaces include condenser pits, manholes, ventilation ducts, tanks, sumps, and containment cavities, among many others.6 Hazards can be controlled by locking out moving parts, de-energizing electrical parts or wiring, blocking steam pipes and product in-feeding pipes, draining or pumping out liquid contents, or air monitoring and ventilating.7

Similarities and Differences in the Standards

How does 29 CFR 1926.1200 differ from general industry standards? It is generally agreed that this new standard was written to mirror many facets of its general industry counterpart. Construction entities that currently implement and comply with the general industry standard will have a strong basis for compliance to the new standard. That stated, there are several differences from the general industry standards that are discussed below.

The updated confined spaces rules include more specific provisions for requiring coordinated activities when multiple employers are on the same work site. These provisions are intended to ensure that hazards are not introduced into a confined space by an employee working on a different project or task nearby. The general industry standard required communication and coordinated activities, but the nature of a construction site with its larger number of contractors makes the dynamic of that coordination somewhat different.

At a construction site, a host employer (the owner of the site) is added to the mix of parties in communication. Prior to entry operations, the host employer must provide information to the controlling contractor on the location and potential hazards of any known confined spaces, as well as any precautions implemented for employee safety. The controlling contractor must then share that information with each entity entering the space or that could potentially introduce a hazard into the space. Each entry employer (subcontractor) should then inform the controlling contractor of the permit space program it plans to follow and any hazards likely to be confronted. The controlling contractor is then responsible for coordinating the activities of entry employers when multiple entities are either in the same space or their activities might conflict and introduce a hazard. After entry operations, the controlling contractor must debrief each entity that entered the permit space regarding the program followed and any hazards encountered. The controlling contractor must then provide the information gathered to the host employer.8

The new standard also includes a “competent person” clause. The general industry rule required that the employer evaluate the work site and identify confined spaces. The new construction standard instead requires evaluation by a “competent person,” perhaps a supervisor, and potentially multiple persons.9

Additionally, the new regulation allows for the mere suspension of a permit rather than a mandated cancellation if a condition not allowed under the entry permit arises with the permit space, so long as the condition is temporary in nature, does not change the configuration of the space, or create any new hazards within it.10

The Part 1926 standard also encourages continuous atmospheric monitoring where possible. The general industry standard required only periodic monitoring and never attached a timing requirement. It is noted that if the employer can demonstrate that periodic monitoring is sufficient, OSHA does not require continuous monitoring.11 However, continuous monitoring is always best practice.

In the new standard, OSHA requires that employers implement an early-warning system that continuously monitors for non-isolated engulfment hazards, such as flash flooding.12

Finally, employers are required to provide safety training in a language and vocabulary that workers understand.

Does This Affect You?
The new confined spaces standard applies to anyone doing construction with the exception of excavations, underground construction, caissons, cofferdams, compressed air, and diving, as specified in the law. If a company is engaging in both construction and industrial work and meets the criteria of 29 CFR 1926.1200—Confined Spaces in Construction, the employer should be in compliance.13

Employers’ Action Steps
Faced with new OSHA regulation, an employer’s action steps should begin with a determination of whether the regulation is relevant, i.e. whether there is a confined space at a work site. If there are one or more confined spaces that include existing or potential hazards, the employer must classify the space accordingly.

In conclusion, the new OSHA confined spaces in construction standard will have wide-reaching effects on the construction industry and the safety of its workers. Dr. Michaels stated that the rule “emphasizes training, continuous work site evaluation and communication requirements to further protect workers’ safety and health.”

Organizations planning to take on a construction project need to be well informed about the impacts of the new regulation and how to adjust their processes in order to remain in compliance. This article serves as a summary of the new standard. Further details on the standard in its entirety, compliance assistance documents, and other resources to help employers and workers understand the rule can be found on OSHA’s Confined Spaces page: www.osha.gov/confinedspaces/.


1. United States Department of Labor, Press Teleconference on Confined Spaces: Remarks Prepared for Delivery by Dr. David Michaels,https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=SPEECHES&p_id=3379. (May 28, 2015)
2. United States Department of Labor, OSHA Confined Spaces Frequently Asked Questions, https://www.osha.gov/confinedspaces/. (May 28, 2015).
3. https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=SPEECHES&p_id=3379.
4. https://www.osha.gov/confinedspaces/.
5. OSHA Confined Spaces in Construction standard, 29 CFR Subpart AA 1926.1200, p. 6,https://www.osha.gov/confinedspaces/1926_subpart_aa.pdf
6. Jeffrey Dalto, Update from OSHA Spokesperson on Publication of Upcoming Confined Spaces in Construction Standard (1926.1200), Convergence Training Blog,http://blog.convergencetraining.com/update-from-osha-spokesperson-on-publication-of-upcoming-confined-spaces-in-construction-standard-1926-1200 (May 29, 2015).
7. Occupational Safety and Health Division of North Carolina, Confined Spaces Training,https://www.env.nm.gov/Ohsb_Website/Training/documents/ConfinedSpaces.ppt (June 6, 2015).
8. Ibid pp. 12-14
9. Ibid p. 8
10. Ibid p. 19
11. Ibid p. 10
12. Ibid p. 16
13. https://www.osha.gov/confinedspaces/

Read more >

GE, Accenture release intelligent pipeline solutions

Re-Posted from The Bakken Magazine
By Ann Bailey | January 06, 2016

GE Accenture Blog Post PicGeneral Electric and Accenture have announced that Columbia Pipeline Group is using its Intelligent Pipeline Solution, a software that assists pipeline operators in making informed decisions about pipeline safety and integrity.

Columbia Pipeline Group now has a real-time view of more than 15,000 miles of interstate pipelines. The ability to monitor pipeline threats with pipeline solution software improves the risk management and produces situational awareness, according to GE.

Columbia Pipeline Group is located within the Marcellus and Utica shale areas of Ohio, West Virginia, Pennsylvania and New York and operates 15,000 miles of interstate natural gas pipelines.

The United States has more than 190,000 miles of liquid petroleum pipelines and 2.4 million miles of natural gas pipelines, according to the American Petroleum Institute. Meanwhile, the Dakota Access, a proposed pipeline would cross 1,134 miles in North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa and Illinois and the Sacagawea Pipeline Company is developing a 76-mile pipeline to deliver crude oil from areas south of the river in McKenzie and Dunn Counties in North Dakota to areas north of Lake Sacagawea.

The global pipeline industry spends more than $40 billion annually to expand and maintain its access network, said Peggy Kostial, senior managing director for Accenture’s North American resources operating group. Sixty percent of the pipelines were installed before 1970 so safety increasingly is a driving factor for operators such as CPG to achieve real time and remote monitoring of their thousands of miles of pipeline, Kostial said.

Intelligent Pipeline Solution is designed to help pipeline operators to rank where resources are best applied so they can reduce the potential for unforeseen events. The software provides an integrated geospatial view of Columbia Pipeline Group’s assets aligned with critical factors related to pipeline integrity, Shawn Patterson, Columbia Pipeline Group CEO said.

The solution integrates data from several sources, including geographic information systems, work management systems and control systems. It also integrates external sources such as the National Aeronautics and Atmospheric Administration and the United States Geological Survey. Intelligent Pipeline Solution also integrates data such as pipeline attributes, risk scores and precipitation and fault lines. Users can use a set of filters and layers to examine data in different ways to quickly locate areas of interest.

Intelligent Pipeline Solution answers the call from transportation pipeline customers to address increased compliance regulations, safety concerns and maintenance and integrity management of their pipelines’ networks, said Brian Palmer, GE Measurement and Control president and CEO.

For more on the Bakken, follow us on Twitter @TheBakkenMag

Read more >